As you can probably imagine, CGI is a component that can actually add a tremendous amount to movies. Filmmakers have been able to use it for a number of reasons, amongst them being the addition of elements that they would not have been able to incorporate otherwise. It is able to promote more dynamic landscapes and bring life to certain features. However, it can also be argued that CGI, regardless of the medium where it's utilized, is an element that has been overexposed in recent times.
CGI is definitely being used to tremendous extents, some examples of its application being better than others. To say the least, CGI is vital, not only in movies but television shows and other forms of visual media as well. For example, I am sure that just about everyone was captivated by the sight of Iron Man saving civilians by coming down from the sky in his third movie. It wasn't a time where we questioned the realism of CGI but rather enjoyed what we were seeing in front of us.
You can look at CGI in a movie almost like whipped cream set atop a bowl of iced cream. It is a nice feature to have, of course, but it's not something that should be considered the focal point. What happens when there is too much whipped cream, though? It can become over-saturated, which is what I feel as though has been the issue of CGI in regards to film and related forms of media. While some parties can make CGI look authentic, this is not the case for everyone.
CGI can be utilized quite poorly, which is shocking when considering just how long CGI in general has been around. The first "Twilight" movie comes to mind, as I was not exactly a fan of all of its visuals. While the paler hues were aesthetically interesting, the CGI werewolves within the movie definitely came across as fake-looking. Yes, werewolves are not real but movies should be able to incorporate special effects so that you can suspend your disbelief and convince yourself that what you are seeing is real.
Unless "Twilight" was supposed to be self-aware - which was not the case - its usage of CGI was underwhelming, to put it mildly. CGI, depending on the party utilizing it, can vary in terms of genuine nature. You may not even realize that you are seeing something that was rendered by computers while you may be able to spot where exactly special features appear phony. In time, one can only hope that movies are able to develop to such a degree that they will be looked at as entirely genuine.
CGI is definitely being used to tremendous extents, some examples of its application being better than others. To say the least, CGI is vital, not only in movies but television shows and other forms of visual media as well. For example, I am sure that just about everyone was captivated by the sight of Iron Man saving civilians by coming down from the sky in his third movie. It wasn't a time where we questioned the realism of CGI but rather enjoyed what we were seeing in front of us.
You can look at CGI in a movie almost like whipped cream set atop a bowl of iced cream. It is a nice feature to have, of course, but it's not something that should be considered the focal point. What happens when there is too much whipped cream, though? It can become over-saturated, which is what I feel as though has been the issue of CGI in regards to film and related forms of media. While some parties can make CGI look authentic, this is not the case for everyone.
CGI can be utilized quite poorly, which is shocking when considering just how long CGI in general has been around. The first "Twilight" movie comes to mind, as I was not exactly a fan of all of its visuals. While the paler hues were aesthetically interesting, the CGI werewolves within the movie definitely came across as fake-looking. Yes, werewolves are not real but movies should be able to incorporate special effects so that you can suspend your disbelief and convince yourself that what you are seeing is real.
Unless "Twilight" was supposed to be self-aware - which was not the case - its usage of CGI was underwhelming, to put it mildly. CGI, depending on the party utilizing it, can vary in terms of genuine nature. You may not even realize that you are seeing something that was rendered by computers while you may be able to spot where exactly special features appear phony. In time, one can only hope that movies are able to develop to such a degree that they will be looked at as entirely genuine.
About the Author:
If you are interested in film design and other such fields, kindly look at art schools in Seattle for further information.. This article, Can CGI Prove To Be Overexposed? is available for free reprint.
